Library

A place to look things up.

A curated knowledge base for understanding cashmere supply chains, sustainability, traceability and transformation — with evidence, data and reference material gathered in one place.

01Data & StatisticsProduction, trade, fibre and sustainability data. 02Research & ReportsPeer-reviewed research, industry and institutional reports. 03Standards & FrameworksStandards, traceability, sustainability and certification. 04Case StudiesPlaces, practices and supply-chain transformations. 05AI & Digital TransformationAI, data, traceability and emerging technologies. 06KnowledgeGlossary, history, fibre references and further reading.

Data & Statistics

01

A research-oriented collection of publicly available secondary data. Every published figure will retain its source, year, unit, data status and methodological qualification.

Global Cashmere Production Audited country-level production figures from publicly available secondary sources. Only figures with an identifiable source and adequate qualification are included.
Published cashmere production observations suitable for inclusion
CountryYearQuantityUnitSourceSource typeMethodology / qualification
China202317,589tonnesTextile Exchange (2024), based on IWTO and National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaIndustry report using official statisticsGreasy cashmere fibre. Reported as China's production and used by Textile Exchange in its global total of 25,611 tonnes. The underlying Chinese statistical basis should be treated as the source chain rather than as a directly published NBS cashmere series.
Mongolia202310,500tonnesGOBI JSC Sustainability Report 2023, citing National Statistics CommitteeCompany sustainability report using national statisticsReported as approximately 10.5 thousand tonnes of raw cashmere; the report's chart identifies National Statistics Committee and says the series is by calculation method. Retain the published approximation rather than implying greater precision.
Afghanistan2015~1,000tonnesDawn (2015), reporting estimates attributed to the World Bank and USAIDSecondary public reporting based on institutional estimatesEstimated annual cashmere production. The source reports Afghanistan as the world's third-largest producer at about 1,000 metric tonnes per year and attributes the underlying estimate to the World Bank and USAID. This is an older estimate, not a current official national statistic; it is retained only as a dated historical observation.
Iran2014~2,000tonnes/yearAnsari-Renani, A Value Chain and Marketing of Iranian Cashmere, Media Peternakan 37(1), 2014Peer-reviewed published estimateThe exact quantity is stated as unknown; the study estimates that about 5 million cashmere goats produce approximately 2,000 tonnes of raw cashmere annually. Historical estimate, not an official national statistic.
India2018 (historical benchmark)70tonnes/yearIshrat, Grigg, Jayamaha & Pulakanam (2018), Cashmere Industry: Value Chains and Sustainability, Figure 1.1Published scholarly source / historical benchmarkFigure 1.1 presents India at approximately 70 tonnes per annum as a historical production benchmark and cites multiple underlying sources. Ishrat et al. (2020) subsequently confirms that India's contribution to global cashmere production is significantly smaller than that of China and Mongolia. This should not be interpreted as a current official national statistic.

Data integrity note. Historical or country figures from older secondary literature, including figures previously displayed on the Supply Chain map, have not been carried forward where a current, traceable source could not be established. In particular, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkey, Nepal, Uzbekistan and New Zealand remain without a country-level production total because no adequately substantiated figure was identified. Pakistan’s recent official statistics report total goat-hair production but do not disaggregate cashmere; regional research confirms pashmina-bearing goats in Gilgit-Baltistan but does not provide a defensible contemporary regional or national cashmere total. Afghanistan is included only as a dated 2015 secondary estimate, while Iran and India are retained as explicitly qualified historical estimates. No estimate has been substituted for a missing observation.

Global reference. Textile Exchange reports approximately 25,611 tonnes of greasy cashmere fibre produced globally in 2023, with China accounting for 17,589 tonnes (69%). This global figure is retained as a contextual benchmark, not as the sum of the country rows above, because the country-level evidence available here is not yet complete.

International Trade Audited trade observations for cashmere and closely defined cashmere-goods classifications. Trade is recorded separately from production and is not used to infer domestic output.
Selected published cashmere trade observations with identifiable provenance
ReporterYearFlow / measureCommodityValueQuantitySourceSource type / qualification
Mongolia2023Exports — cashmere and cashmere productsAggregate cashmere sectorUS$441.2 millionNot reported as a single aggregate quantityMONTSAME, 2024, citing Mongolian Wool and Cashmere AssociationNational news agency reporting industry-association data. Aggregate value includes cashmere and cashmere products and therefore is not comparable with raw-fibre trade values.
Mongolia2023Exports — washed cashmereWashed cashmereUS$263.6 million5,449 tonnesMONTSAME, 2024, citing Mongolian Wool and Cashmere AssociationPublished industry figure. The 5,449 tonnes represented 74% of Mongolia's domestic washed-cashmere output according to the cited source. This is processed/washed material, not raw cashmere.
Pakistan2023Imports — valueHS 510531: fine animal hair, carded/combed, of Kashmir (cashmere) goats~US$173,000Not established from the cited sourceTrade data derived from UN Comtrade, reported by TrendEconomySecondary trade-database observation. Represents approximately 60% of Pakistan's 2023 imports under HS 5105; it demonstrates cashmere trade but is not evidence of domestic production.
China2023Exports — valueHS 510211: fine animal hair, not carded/combed, of Kashmir (cashmere) goatsUS$10.05 millionNot reported in the surfaced sourceTrade data derived from UN Comtrade, reported by TrendEconomySecondary trade-database observation. Export value for uncarded/uncombed cashmere hair; partner breakdown identifies France, Italy and the UK as the main destinations.

Trade-data qualification. HS classification matters. HS 510531 covers fine animal hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats, carded or combed; HS 510211 covers the same animal hair not carded or combed. These are distinct trade classifications and should not be combined without a defined conversion methodology. Trade values and quantities describe cross-border transactions, not production. Where a source reports an aggregate cashmere-products value, it is retained as an aggregate trade indicator rather than presented as a fibre value.

Evidence standard. The Library will prioritise customs statistics and UN Comtrade-derived observations with an identifiable HS code, reporting country, year and flow. Shipment-level commercial databases may be used only as corroborating evidence and will not be treated as national totals. Missing quantities remain missing rather than being reconstructed from price assumptions.

Fibre & Market Data Audited fibre-quality and market indicators, kept separate from production and trade data. Where processing yield or price data are context-dependent, the source and qualification are preserved.
Published cashmere fibre and market observations with identifiable provenance
Data areaYear/PeriodIndicatorValueUnitSourceSource type / qualification
Fibre qualityPublished rangeFibre diameter12–18μmPublished peer-reviewed research on cashmere goat fibresacademic literature; range varies by breed, origin and fibre sample; not a single grading standard.
Fibre qualityPublished commercial suitabilityFine fibre<18μmPeer-reviewed research on Raeini cashmere goatsMost commercially suitable fibres for knitting are reported as finer than 18 μm; this is a research-based suitability guideline, not a universal cashmere grade.
Processing yield2024 publicationRaw to dehaired cashmere conversion0.525kg dehaired per kg rawCashmere value chain analyses in MongoliaPublished value-chain analysis; a representative processing scenario, values vary with raw fibre composition and technology.
Price2024 cashmere seasonRaw Mongolian cashmere purchase price185,000MNT/kgSustainable Fibre Alliance, 2024Approximately 185,000 MNT/kg in 2024, versus 165,000 MNT/kg in 2023; price is a seasonal and location-specific market indicator, not a global cashmere price.

Fibre-data qualification. Fibre diameter and staple length vary considerably by breed, geography, age, sex, fibre sampling and processing conditions. The values above are therefore retained as published observations or suitability ranges, not as a single definitive cashmere specification.

Processing yield qualification. The 0.525 deahaired cashmere per kg of raw cashmere comes from a published Mongolian value-chain analysis and includes washing and dehairing losses of 30% and 25% respectively. It should not be applied as a universal conversion factor for all cashmere.

Market-price qualification. The 2024 Mongolian raw cashmere price of 185,000 MNT/kg is a published SFA market indicator for the season, with 165,000 MNT/kg in 2023 for context. It is not to be presented as a universal spot price for global cashmere.

Evidence standard. Future updates should prefer public or peer-reviewed data with identifiable sampling, year, geography, fibre form and measurement method; commercial price series will be labelled as market indicators with a specific region and time period.

Sustainability Indicators Selected public indicators that help assess the environmental, animal-welfare, climate and social dimensions of cashmere production. Indicators are kept separate from production totals and certification volumes.
Selected publicly reported sustainability indicators for cashmere
IndicatorYear / periodValueUnitGeography / scopeSourceQualification
Goat livestock loss during dzud2024~2.5 milliongoats lostMongoliaSustainable Fibre Alliance (2024), citing Mongolia Ministry of Food, Agriculture & Light IndustryReported loss during the 2024 dzud. SFA states that goats accounted for about 2.5 million of more than 7.44 million livestock lost. This is a climate-shock indicator, not a cashmere-production loss estimate.
Accumulated goat losses2023–2024~20%of goat populationMongoliaSustainable Fibre Alliance (2024)SFA reports accumulated goat losses of around 20% over two consecutive years. The figure reflects livestock losses associated with severe winter conditions and should not be interpreted as a direct percentage reduction in national cashmere output.
SFA-certified cashmere volume20231,322tonnesMongolia — SFA programmeSustainable Fibre Alliance (2024)Certified-programme volume only. It is not Mongolia's total cashmere production and must not be used as a national production statistic.
SFA-certified cashmere volume2024600tonnesMongolia — SFA programmeSustainable Fibre Alliance (2024)Certified-programme volume reported after the 2024 dzud; SFA noted a maximum expected volume of around 800 tonnes. This is not a national production estimate.
Cashmere environmental impact drivers2026 studyHerd productivity and management practicesqualitative LCA findingMongolia & ChinaTextile Exchange, Cashmere Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Study, 2026The LCA identifies herd-level productivity, including cashmere yield per animal, and management practices such as winter supplementary feeding as key environmental-impact drivers within the study assumptions.
Extreme-weather impact2026 studyIncreased impacts during dzud conditionsqualitative LCA findingMongolia & Inner MongoliaTextile Exchange, Cashmere Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Study, 2026The study reports that heavy snowfall, freezing temperatures and harsh winters following summer drought can increase environmental impacts through lower productivity and higher animal mortality.

Interpretation. Sustainability indicators are deliberately presented as indicators rather than converted into a single composite score. Livestock losses and certified volumes describe specific programmes, events or reporting scopes; they are not interchangeable with national production data.

LCA qualification. Textile Exchange's 2026 cashmere LCA uses harmonized primary data from 170 herders and farmers across Mongolia and China and covers cashmere production and primary processing on a cradle-to-gate basis. The study is intended to improve impact-data quality and provide proxy data where source-specific LCA data are unavailable.

Evidence standard. Future indicators will prioritise quantified environmental, animal-welfare and social measures with an identifiable year, geography, scope and methodology. Where robust numerical evidence is unavailable, the Library will retain a clearly labelled qualitative finding rather than manufacture a numerical indicator.

Knowledge

06

Foundational reference material for understanding cashmere, its history, terminology and fibre characteristics.

Glossary

A–Z
Micron (μ)
A unit of fibre diameter — one micron is one-millionth of a metre. Cashmere is graded largely by micron count; finer fibre (lower number) is more valuable and softer.
Dehairing
The process of mechanically separating a goat's fine, soft down from the coarser "guard hairs" that protect its outer coat. A technically demanding step — damaging the down here lowers value for everything downstream.
Staple length
The length of an individual fibre. Along with micron, it's one of the two main measurements used to grade raw cashmere.
GI (Geographical Indication)
A legal protection tying a product's name to a specific place and production method — so, for example, only pashmina genuinely hand-spun and hand-woven in Kashmir from qualifying fibre can carry that GI-protected designation.
Kani weave
A Kashmiri weaving technique, originating in the village of Kanihama, where the pattern is woven directly into the cloth using small eyeless wooden bobbins called kanis — rather than embroidered on afterward.
Yinder
A traditional wooden spinning wheel used in Kashmir to hand-spin cleaned pashm fibre into yarn — a slow method, producing only around 50 grams of thread per spinner per month.
Sozni
A fine Kashmiri needle-and-thread embroidery technique, sometimes used to further decorate a finished hand-woven shawl.
Grade A / B / C
Common industry shorthand for cashmere quality tiers, roughly: Grade A (≈14–16.5μ, finest, luxury knitwear), Grade B (≈16.5–19μ, soft everyday wear), Grade C (≈19μ+, coarser, outerwear and blankets). These bands vary somewhat by source rather than being a single universal standard.
Moulting / combing
Cashmere goats shed their soft winter undercoat naturally each spring. Herders comb this out by hand during the few-week moulting window — gentler than shearing, and generally considered better for fibre quality.
Pashmina
Originally, the specific fine cashmere from goats raised in the Himalayan region (particularly Ladakh's Changthangi goats) and hand-woven in Kashmir. Often used more loosely today as a synonym for "fine cashmere shawl."
Changthangi / Chyangra goat
The high-altitude cashmere goat breeds behind two of the finest fibres in the world — Changthangi in Ladakh (India) and Chyangra in Nepal's high Himalayan districts.
Paisley (boteh)
The swirling teardrop motif associated with Kashmiri shawls. The name "paisley" actually comes from Paisley, Scotland — a mill town that mass-produced machine-woven imitations of the pattern in the 19th century.

A Brief History of Pashmina & Cashmere

15th century — today

The craft's documented roots trace to the 15th century, when Kashmir's Sultan Zain-ul-Abidin is credited with inviting Persian weavers into the valley, fusing Central Asian tribal weaving with Persian tapestry techniques into what would become the Kani shawl tradition. By the 16th century, under Mughal patronage — particularly Emperor Akbar, said to have called the fabric parm narm, "extremely soft" — pashmina had become a fixture of court life: gifted as robes of honour, woven into diplomacy, and used in royal ceremony. Certain designs were even named after the rulers who favoured them.

Europe's fascination arrived later, and it arrived through conquest and trade. Napoleon Bonaparte brought Kashmiri shawls back from his Egyptian campaign at the turn of the 19th century, and Empress Joséphine's enthusiasm for them — she is said to have owned close to 200 — helped ignite a craze across French and British high society. The East India Company's returning employees carried shawls home to Britain around the same period. The French, struggling with the word "Kashmir," rendered it as "cashmere" — the name that stuck in the West ever since.

European demand outpaced what Kashmir's artisans could hand-produce, so mills in Europe — most famously in Paisley, Scotland — began mass-producing machine-woven imitations of the shawl's swirling boteh motif. That town lent its name to the pattern the world still calls "paisley" today. Industrialisation made the imitation cheap and the original increasingly rare, and the handmade craft went into a long decline through the 19th and 20th centuries. Its revival in recent decades has leaned on exactly the kind of protection this platform tries to support: Geographical Indication status, provenance certification, and a market slowly relearning to pay for verified handwork rather than the version mass-produced in its name.

Sources & Further Reading

Methodology

Facts on this site — production figures, historical dates, craft-process details — are drawn from a mix of industry overviews and trade reporting, Geographical Indication registration records, and historical accounts. As the Library develops, each data resource will identify its original public source and any methodological qualification.

Where sources disagree — which happens often with production-share estimates and some historical dates — we favour hedged, approximate language ("around," "commonly cited as") over false precision, and we cross-reference multiple independent sources before stating something as established rather than relying on a single claim.

This is an evolving practice, not a finished one. If you know of a source that would sharpen or correct anything on this site, we'd genuinely like to hear about it — get in touch.

Fibre Comparison Reference

By micron
FibreTypical range (microns)Source animal
Cashmere14–20μCashmere goat
Merino wool~11–24μMerino sheep
Mohair25–45μAngora goat
Angora (fibre)~12–16μAngora rabbit
Human hair≈90μ (average)—

Ranges are approximate and vary by source, breed, and individual animal — see the interactive scale at the top of this page for how cashmere's own grading works in practice.

Something missing, or worth adding?

This library will keep growing. If there's a term, a source, or a comparison you think belongs here, let us know.